WEAPONIZATION OF EXPERTISE
  • The Book
  • Writing & Media
  • The Authors
  • FAQ
  • Order
  • Contact

Writing & Media

Shorter essays, interviews, and podcasts exploring the central themes of Weaponization of Expertise.

March 1, 2026

Inquisitive Review: Just the Facts

In Inquisitive, the quarterly magazine of Heterodox Academy, Thomas S. Huddle reviews The Weaponization of Expertise:

Popular skepticism of establishment orthodoxy and expert opinion, far from being a sign of ignorance or anti-intellectualism, is often warranted and sometimes closer to reality than what is being put forth by the experts. And the experts, rather than carefully and impartially bringing their expertise to policymaking, often disguise nakedly political judgments as expertise.

Still, their broader indictment of elites for supposing that expertise can settle what are actually political disputes is persuasive—even though there are many who will not be persuaded.

read more
August 25, 2025

How to Save the American University

At its heart, a university is a gamble on what happens when an institution shows an uncompromising commitment to free speech. Academic freedom is not just another rule in a policy manual. It is perhaps the constitutive feature of the modern American university, which is envied the world over. Yet few universities have come to a full-throated defense of that value. Few administrators seem to publicly espouse it; faculty openly question it; and the public hardly has reason to believe in it if universities themselves do not. For the university to save its soul, attitudes will have to change. […]

read more
July 30, 2025

La Presse Essay: Should we make fun of conspiracy theorists?

La Presse, the Montreal-based Canadian newspaper, features The Weaponization of Expertise in an essay on conspiracy theories:

Contrary to this mockery, Russell and Patterson call for a sincere dialogue that could lead to much-needed reconciliation. Liberal democracy is not based on the infallibility of experts, but on everyone’s ability to be heard—even when they are wrong.

(translated from the original French)

Read the full essay (in French).

read more
June 25, 2025

Undark Book Review: The Trouble With Depending on Experts

Writing in Undark, a magazine exploring the intersection of science and society, Frieda Klotz reviews The Weaponization of Expertise:

Russell and Patterson, two law professors at Rutgers University, elucidate the many other ways in which they believe expertise has gone awry. …[W]hile the government’s response to the pandemic forms the backdrop to their thesis, Russell and Patterson want to make a broader point: experts have misused their authority, deployed their credentials to suppress dissent, and fed a public distrust that has backfired and led to populism.

read more
May 26, 2025

The New Yorker Best Books of the Week

The New Yorker named The Weaponization of Expertise to its “Best Books We Read This Week” list, calling it a “persuasive account of how “tentative conclusions proclaimed by the powerful can harden into orthodoxies.”

In The New Yorker’s May 26, 2025 issue, Daniel Immerwahr reviews The Weaponization of Expertise in an essay:

“For liberals, veneration of expertise became a shibboleth… There was something ‘deeply ironic’ about formulating the support for science as a religious creed, Jacob Hale Russell and Dennis Patterson observe in The Weaponization of Expertise.”

read more
May 10, 2025

Dennis Patterson on the Campbell Conversations

Grant Reeher interviews Dennis Patterson on the Campbell Conversations, an NPR interview show from WRVO in Central New Yorker:

[Restoring political judgment] starts with it starts with the recognition that your interlocutor is not someone who proceeds in bad faith, that in fact, people have different views of the world. It’s like the old liberal political ideal that my conception of the good is something that I get to decide, not you, not the state. And so people have different competing conceptions of the good. If you cannot proceed in a respectful conversation where you take the other person seriously, you let to make their argument, you don’t make ad hominem arguments about them, that’s the sort of thing that I think we need to do. And I think in some ways that aspect is getting a bit is getting a bit better. Because Trump is such a polarizing figure, that no one really wants to be associated with that temperament. And it’s all about temperament. If you evince disdain for people, no conversation as possible. So just at that very basic level, respect for your interlocutor is a great place to start.

read more
April 24, 2025

The Motivated Skeptic: Some Thoughts on Elites, Populism, and The Mess We Are All In

The Motivated Skeptic, a Substack published by the Scottish philosopher Robin McKenna, has an thoughtful and extended review of Weaponization of Expertise:

A recent book…sets out to explain and critique the technocratic mindset and the common narrative about the problem with public discourse that goes with it…. They quite rightly skewer assorted members of the expert class for two related failings: they over-estimate their own skills and abilities, and they under-estimate the skills and abilities of ordinary people… As a corrective to the pathologies of elite discourse, this is welcome.

read more
April 23, 2025

Ataraxia or Bust Review: A book review that underscores the current urgent need for skepticism.

In Ataraxia or Bust, his Substack on Pyrrhonism, Doug Bates reviews The Weaponization of Expertise:

If you’re interested in an analysis of the extensive and wide-ranging recent failures of expertise, The Weaponization of Expertise is the go-to book.

Read the full essay here.

read more
March 28, 2025

Le Point Essay: Has Covid killed democracy in the name of knowledge?

Le Point, one of the major French news magazines, features The Weaponization of Expertise in an essay by Peggy Sastre:

Follow the science. This phrase, omnipresent throughout the Covid-19 pandemic, was intended to be reassuring…. But what initially served as a guide gradually turned into an injunction. Behind the legitimate call to reason, a shift occurred. It was no longer an invitation to understand, but a summons to remain silent. Don’t argue, the experts know. And anyone who questions ceases to be a citizen and becomes an obstacle. A heresy.

read more
March 4, 2025

Actually, Sometimes Facts Don't Matter

The book is on-sale today, and TIME Magazine has an extended excerpt from Weaponziation of Expertise’s chapter on misinformation:

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.” This saying has become one of the most overused phrases of the Trump era. It has a seductive appeal in a partisan era. It’s reassuring—your opponents must simply be misinformed—and suggests an easy solution—make sure people have the right information, and disagreement magically dissolves.

read more
  • ««
  • «
  • 1
  • 2
  • »
  • »»
The Weaponization of Expertise: How Elites Fuel Populism